Long before Half Blood Prince went into production, I was curious as to which bits in the film would be kept and which bits would be cut out.  I was convinced that the director would keep as much of the main plot as possible, as had been done in the past, so I was not surprised that Fleur Delacour would not be appearing in the film nor did I join other fans’ outbursts.

However, when I heard that they would be ‘adding’ scenes, I became worried.  What’s more that they would be action scenes involving the destruction of the Millennium Bridge and the Burrow, I was a little suspicious.  I didn’t fully believe their claims that they were just thrown in to show that not even the muggle world was safe, or how not even the Weasleys were safe.  I’m still convinced that a main reason for throwing them in was just to make the film more ‘action-based’, as little action actually happens in the book (Then again I saw this as a chance to create a fantasy film more about character development than action, something which had been failed to be realised).
Read the rest of this entry »

Share this blog post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Written on August 2nd, 2009 , Cinema Tags: ,

‘The Spirit’ is a film that critics have not been very kind to. According to ‘Rotten Tomatoes’, only 15% of reviewers gave it a good review. This I feel has been an unfair response, as I have seen many films that are more worthy of this result than Spirit. Although it is by no means one of the greatest films ever made, it’s certainly not one of the most terrible. Although it did feel like the film was missing something, it’s hard to pinpoint what that was.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this blog post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Written on January 10th, 2009 , Cinema Tags: , ,

Where has Baz Luhrmann been since Moo Roo in 2001? If he’s been working on Australia all that time, then I’m sorely disappointed at his time management skills.

Haughty aristocratic woman goes to rough, barren landscape and comes to love a noble, but uncultured man’s man with variable facial hair and a nice hat. They acquire a small Aboriginal boy as their adopted son and overcome trials and evil cattle barons. Kipling Flynn of harmonica fame reminded me very, very strongly of the sozzled former WWI pilot in the Mummy. As plots go, then, it’s not the most original and you can predict with some confidence what the outcome will be. Having said that, Nicole Kidman manages just about to pull off a believable transition from said lordly Ladyship to human being and what’s not to like about Hugh Jackman? It must also be admitted that in parts the film is rather funny. I cite the underwear fight and the kangaroo as two fine examples. If you haven’t seen it yet, watch out for those.

The landscapes are beautiful, as one might expect. BL does a good job as Australia’s official PR guy. Having said that, I did think that semi-primitive Darwin was the most impressive of the backdrops in the same sort of way that Paris became part of the action in Moo Roo.

Re the Aborigines, there’s something of a political agenda going on here. Nullah, a half-Aborigine boy, whose mother works on the cattle station owned by NK’s husband at the beginning of the film, narrates the action (slightly irritating after a while). His greatest fear is that he’ll be taken away to a mission island by the Catholic church and his greatest wish is to be accepted by one community or another (the ‘white fellas’ or the ‘black fellas’). He’s constantly watched over by his magic-singing grandfather, who seems to enjoy building bonfires on incredibly steep hills and has a very good aim. Now, given that the Australian government only issued an official apology to those people of

Aboriginal origin who were affected by the  missions in 2008, this could be hot stuff. Having said that, it doesn’t weigh down the film nearly as much as one might expect from reading the opening over-screen paragraphs. In fact, in the end, Nullah’s eventual capture by the dastardly priests seems merely a plot device to allow the family to reunite for the finish.

An enjoyable film, but not a particularly memorable one.

Share this blog post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Written on January 2nd, 2009 , Cinema Tags: , , , , ,

Dan and I were roped into a family outing to see the latest Bond this afternoon at the O2 Centre on Finchley Road. The revamp has gone well, incidentally: a fine new cafe (an Apostrophe) sits proudly in the centre of the ground floor of the building where once a much ignored fish tank and two massage chairs lumpenly stood; furthermore, Waterstone’s (formerly Books Etc) now boasts a much improved ancient history books section. We bought the Rough Guide to Italy (thinking of going to Sicily) and Tom Holland’s Persian Fire.

It was a good opening scene – Bond (Daniel Craig) and foe rattling round the tunnel on the edge of Lake Garda and what appeared to be the Carrera marble quarry with some geezer from the last film loaded into the boot in preparation for questioning by M (Judi Dench) back at the MI6 lair.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this blog post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Written on November 9th, 2008 , Cinema

The Inconvenient Mule is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Life and times from the edge of the Chilterns